<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    <channel>
        <title>DOM Scripting comments: Names and IDs</title>
        <link>http://domscripting.com/blog/display/90</link>
        <description>An annoying quirk of IE.</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <item>
            <title>Jason</title>
            <link>http://domscripting.com/blog/display.php/90#comment707</link>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Steve. Although IE7 is an improvement, I was expecting more.  It&#8217;s unbelievable that a company like Microsoft can&#8217;t match Firefox&#8217;s ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Steve Tucker</title>
            <link>http://domscripting.com/blog/display.php/90#comment703</link>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These type of wreckless Internet Exporer bugs boil my blood. People working on the web shouldnt have to tip toe around these issues any longer. IE7 is a large advancement over 6, but I&#8217;m still disapointed by the result; I was hoping for something as solid as FF. Fat chance.</p>

<p>Sorry to hear about the problem Jeremy. Book was excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:34:47 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Emil Stenström</title>
            <link>http://domscripting.com/blog/display.php/90#comment702</link>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, if you mean &quot;turn their attention towards &#8230; Javascript&quot; in they way of turning it away from CSS, I don&#8217;t agree. The support for CSS has been improved but it&#8217;s still far behind all the others. When it comes to Javascript they are at least competing in the same league. Of course, we could always hope they have different groups from CSS and Javascript so prioritizing one doesn&#8217;t hurt the other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>aNou</title>
            <link>http://domscripting.com/blog/display.php/90#comment701</link>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i also remember having problems with IE to make my javascript work when i only used the ID for an element and the only solution i found was to add a NAME with the same value to that element. quite odd&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Jeremy Keith</title>
            <link>http://domscripting.com/blog/display.php/90#comment700</link>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lachlan, Google <em>does</em> make use of the meta description if one is provided. It is shown in the search result list as the description for that page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:29:22 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lachlan Hunt</title>
            <link>http://domscripting.com/blog/display.php/90#comment699</link>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better yet, just don&#8217;t use the useless meta element for anything, since no search engine pays much attention to it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 05:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
   </channel>
</rss>